Daily Hayat – روزنامہ حیات
Daily Hayat
زبان / Languageاردو
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Free E-Paper
mumtazkhaksar6@gmail.com
+92 345 8886292
© 2026 Daily Hayat. All rights reserved. Azad Jammu & Kashmir's Premier News Organization.
ADاشتہار / AdvertisementGoogle Ad
HomeEnglishThe Quiet Poison on Our Plates: Why Food Adulteration Must Become a National Priority

The Quiet Poison on Our Plates: Why Food Adulteration Must Become a National PriorityEnglish

hammadkhaksar
By hammadkhaksar
2026-10-09
4 min read
0 views

Every morning in Pakistan, millions of families begin their day with a glass of milk they trust. Most of them never stop to wonder whether that milk is what it claims to be. That quiet trust is exactl

The Quiet Poison on Our Plates: Why Food Adulteration Must Become a National Priority
Share:

Food adulteration is not a new problem here. It is the watered-down milk, the powdered starch sold as flour, the artificial colours mixed into spices, the reused cooking oil that changes hands between markets. Everyone has heard the stories. Fewer people stop to consider the cumulative cost: weakened immunity in children, chronic illnesses in adults, and a population that pays twice — once at the shop counter and again at the pharmacy.

What makes the problem so stubborn is that it is rarely one person’s crime. Adulteration thrives in the gaps between production and regulation. A small vendor cuts corners to survive rising costs. A middleman dilutes a batch because nobody checks. Inspectors are few, testing laboratories fewer, and penalties, when they come at all, are light enough to be treated as the cost of doing business. The result is a system in which honesty is penalised and cheating is subsidised.

ADاشتہار / AdvertisementGoogle Ad

It is tempting to frame this purely as a failure of enforcement. But enforcement alone will not fix a culture problem. Food safety has to become personal before it becomes political. Every consumer is also, in a sense, an inspector: reading labels, questioning suspiciously cheap prices, refusing to buy from vendors who keep food in visibly unhygienic conditions. Awareness is not a substitute for regulation, but it is the soil in which regulation grows. A public that demands safe food gives regulators the backing — and the pressure — they need.

There is also a dignity dimension that rarely gets discussed. Adulterated food disproportionately harms the poor. Families with the least choice are the ones most exposed to the cheapest, most compromised products. When a labourer buys cooking oil of doubtful purity or a daily wager feeds his children diluted milk, it is not carelessness; it is compulsion. A country that tolerates this is tolerating a quiet, daily injustice against its most vulnerable citizens.

So what should change? First, testing must become visible and routine. Mobile testing vans in markets, public display of inspection results, and a simple channel for citizens to report suspicious food would change the economics of cheating. Second, the law must bite. Fines that can be absorbed and forgotten are not deterrents; they are fees. Third — and most importantly — food safety must enter the classroom. A child who learns why adulterated food is dangerous grows into an adult who will not accept it.

There is reason for cautious hope. Food authorities in several provinces have shown that enforcement works when it is consistent. Markets do respond to publicised raids; vendors do adjust when they believe someone is actually watching. The missing ingredient is not knowledge of what to do — it is the sustained will to do it every day, not just during headline-grabbing campaigns.

The food on our plates carries the story of everyone who handled it. In Pakistan, that story too often includes someone who chose profit over health. Rewriting it will require regulators with teeth, consumers with vigilance, and a society that refuses to treat adulteration as a minor offence. Our plates deserve better — and so do our children.