
Fazlur Rehman Salary Questions: Income Rise Under ScrutinyPakistan
A 24NewsHD report says JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s declared salary and bank balance rose sharply, raising questions about who employs and pays him.

Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman has, according to a 24NewsHD report published on Friday, turned out to be a salaried person, a disclosure that has raised fresh questions about his declared income and expenditure over recent years.
According to the report, the central questions are which organisation employs the JUI-F chief and which organisation pays him millions of rupees in salary. The report says the questions arose after a review of the income and wealth details he submitted covering the years 2021 to 2023.
The report says the amount in his bank account rose from Rs8,456 to more than Rs16 million over the three-year period. It also points to a difference between the Form-B and the wealth statement he submitted, although it does not explain what caused the difference or how large it was.
The report further says the annual salary he draws rose from over Rs700,000 to more than Rs9.1 million in 2024 alone, and asks which organisation is responsible for that increase.
Another question raised in the report concerns a spacious, luxurious house in Islamabad’s G-6 sector, with the report asking who owns the property.
Earlier questions over properties
The report follows an earlier 24NewsHD report, published on 8 November 2026, in which questions were raised over two properties in Islamabad’s G-6/4 area allegedly linked to Fazlur Rehman and his son Asad Mahmood — House No. 7 and a four-kanal House No. 11, estimated at around Rs2 billion. According to that report, the properties were registered in other people’s names, while the report itself noted that the claims about them had not been independently established.
Other outlets, including Minute Mirror and DND, have reported that the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) are looking into the properties and associates, and that an associate, Amanullah, was placed on a travel-ban list on 3 November.
The reports raise questions rather than reaching conclusions. The claims about the properties have not been independently established, and the questions over the declared income, the salary increase and the G-6 house remain the subject of the reporting rather than any finding.






