Islamabad: The Political Race Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has documented its answer to the High Court (SC) in the Sunni Ittehad Committee (SIC) saved seat case, expressing that the board couldn’t present its rundown on the last date, for example, January 24.
As per the answer of the Political Race Commission, the SIC can’t be given held seats, as the last date for presenting the rundown of saved seats was January 24. However, the chamber neglected to present the rundown of held seats.
The ECP has expressed that, as indicated by the SIC constitution, no non-Muslim can be an individual from the party; the state of the SIC constitution against the incorporation of non-Muslims is unlawful; in this manner, the committee isn’t qualified to hold seats for ladies and minorities.
As per the ECP’s answer, endorsements were looked for based on the possibility of giving them the political race image of PTI-Nazariyati. Afterwards, the actual applicants pulled out of the political race image of PTI-Nazariyati (PTI-N) and were proclaimed free.
The ECP has expressed that after the races, the free competitors joined the Sunni Ittehad Board, and the Political Race Commission gave a choice of four to one not to give saved seats to the committee. After this, the Peshawar High Court maintained the choice of the ECP on the allure of the Sunni Ittehad Board.
Accordingly, the ECP said that the board isn’t qualified for held seats, and there is no blemish in the choice of the Political Race Commission and the Peshawar High Court not to give saved seats. Additionally, the choice to designate seats is as per the Constitution and the law.
Then again, the Sunni Ittehad Board introduced extra archives in the High Court on account of saved seats. Advocate Salman Akram Raja, showing up for the benefit of Kanwal Shaujab, introduced extra archives in the High Court.
Among the extra reports, warnings given by the Political Race Commission with respect to two fruitful individuals from the public gathering were likewise positioned under the steady gaze of the High Court.
The choice to move toward the Political Race Commission on the request against pronouncing autonomous applicants is likewise remembered for the archives. The extra reports additionally remember the Political Race Commission’s February 2 choice for autonomous individuals.
The request expresses that extra reports are exceptionally important to take a choice on account of saved seats, thus extra archives ought to be permitted to be welcomed on legal record for the case. The High Court is planned to hear the instance of held seats on June 24. The full court headed by Boss Equity Qazi Faez Isa will hear the case.
